To inspire and empower a generation.

I believe that the new generation is pushing a need for authenticity. No longer is there a supposed ‘who cares?’ attitude towards work, the environment or political issues – this is a generation held strong by belief, activism and question.

In a time where the information noise around the financial market, international safety, youth, drugs, sex, etc. rules — the new generation are seeking genuine leadership and progress on a scale not seen before.  We lean forward, and rarely sit back.

In times of old, when a warrior of a tribe would fight for a position of power, it was a demonstration of strength and skill.  When that warrior ascended through certain ranks or levels of authority, it was generally due to his superiors’ acknowledgment that the other troops will follow.

Leadership is achieved through the ability to inspire and empower. Who would you follow onto the battlefield?

Why should this change? I’ve noticed that in fast-growing companies, staff members are often thrust into managerial roles without fully understanding exactly what is going on, and sometimes their teams grow much larger within a short period.  This leaves them feeling overwhelmed — soon the team notices and the breakdown of communication begins.

There are people I’ve met who have truly inspired me, and to be mentored or to work under them would be a true privilege.  I may be at a different point in my career than others, but the conversation that these two words have brought with them is very intriguing.

So tell me — are the two inseparable?  And what are your thoughts?

  • Kate Carruthers: @jyesmith the two are inseparable – good leadership with bad mgmt is useless; & bad leadership with good mgmt is also useless
  • Katie Chatfield:@jyesmith did Obama lead to victory or did he manage? I think a leader empowers and a manager maintains.
  • Katie Chatfield: @kcarruthers @jyesmith Jesus? Gandhi? A leader leads. Managers follow.
  • Kate Carruthers: Yep agree that leadership binary, got it or not, but mgmt can be learned or delegated. But leadership is viral, if you demonstrate it then others demonstrate it too. Poor leadership is also viral & IMHO associated with poor mgt

More from the Twitterati:

  • Anique Vered: @jyesmith a leader guides, inspires, delegates – a manager oversees, and yes, maintains
  • Munky75
  • jbewes: @jyesmith In my world (apparently not planet Earth): Leaders inspire & influence for results; Managers direct. Eg, Dalai Lama=leader not mgr
  • edwardharran: @jyesmith Leadership: inherent, nature quality. Management: learned, developed. Sometimes good m’t no l’p, Vice Versa. Good in both is best

From Facebook:

  • Laura Parker: Leadership is eating all the cake; management is dividing the cake equally amongst others. God I want cake.
  • Jay Kay: Barack Obama is a leader, David Brent is a manager.
  • Ashwin Sridhar: Management is planning. Leadership is about people.
  • Zac Martin: Sounds like a first year Management assignment…Also, I heard something about cake?
Spread it
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis

Also of interest: